jump to navigation

Career Gyaan (Harmless) June 27, 2006

Posted by tejas in General.
1 comment so far

I went to a tech company in NOIDA today.  A typical “$100 million” revenue company, with coffee table work culture and “we are the next winners” attitude.  Not at all a bad company to start your career.  If you are determined and enthusiast about the profile you get there, you can certainly make a huge difference to the company and to your own career.  The industry recognition you get would be immensely helpful for the next jump.  The confidence that oozes out of you when you have a fast track career is something most of us would personally enjoy, and that is something I’m looking for. 

There’s this perpetual argument, whether to work for a big company or a small company.  Working for a small company can mean having a significant share of responsibilities right from the beginning.  Your opinions are given serious considerations.  You mostly work in small teams, and hence have a genuine chance to highlight your work and efforts.  You know you team better.  New initiatives require less number of reviews, which means fewer delays.  You get an opportunity to interact with the senior managements a little too often.  The policies are devised to nurture the creative spirits, and hence flexibility is more.  Most important is the learning and the exposure part.  A two year break at a mid-size company would certainly give you much more exposure, and hence more learning, then a two year break at a big company. 

Some disadvantages of working for a small/medium scale company include less recognition outside your industry.  There might seem to be a perpetual resource crunch, no matter how much the topline improves.  After a certain time span, you might reach a saturation point in career with regards to the company.  You suddenly find that you are doing the same kind of job with the same kind of people.  Nothing has changed since the last review except your pay packet.  This might be suffocating.  Although you love the job, you decide to leave it because career advancement is just not visible in the near future. 

In a big company, apart from the above points, you get a chance to meet a lot of achievers (and a chance to get inspired for a few people, like me, who are always looking for inspiration).  I believe that to a certain extent, the attitude towards work is shaped by the people we are working with.  A big company does not have all achievers, but has enough number of people to get you going. 

The career in a big company remains slow track for most of us.  High fliers from big companies are very less.  Most of the movers and the shakers of the industry would attribute a reasonable part of their success to the small company they’ve worked for. 

More gyaan on this coming soon.  Let me know if you’ve got something to say.

Delhi Blues June 26, 2006

Posted by tejas in Books, General.
add a comment

Back at delhi, landed here on 22nd.  Term 4 starts on July 9th.  A good two weeks before the action starts.

Term 1, 2 and 3 made me realise that 24 hours in a day is not enuf for all the action that is going around.  Now that i've got all the time in the world, i'm doing nothing except books, blogs and orkut.  The cliche about greener grass holds true most of the time i guess.

Currently reading "One up on the Wall Street" by Peter Lynch.  A good book on stocks (and not on stock markets).  Asks you to make an investment instead of trade.  Peter Lynch is surely impressive when he makes readers realise that one need not be continuously checking out the technical analysis or the intraday charts for that matter to invest in stocks.  A little bit of common sense and a bit of research is all one needs to pick up the tenbaggers (stocks that increase 9 folds). 

Read a few articles on "net neutrality".  Check out www.savetheinternet.com for more information.

Nothing more at the moment. 

Ciao.

Concluding Summers June 13, 2006

Posted by tejas in Summers 2006.
add a comment

Ended my summer consulting assignment on 5th June.  After exploring a lot of alternatives, I narrowed down to four recommendations.  The central procurement cell as well my guide for global sourcing was quite happy about it.  The implementation part would take time, if at all it happens.  I would have loved to see it happening, but that would mean at least six months, which is way beyond the time available. 

Indian manufacturing firms are way behind when it comes to low-tech products.  On an average, the capacity of copper tube manufacturer in China is ten times bigger than that of his counterpart in India.  Thailand and South Korea are also in the race.  Primary reasons why China is succeeding is huge capacity. 

Other reasons include government support in the form of SEZs like the one in Jiangsu province or Shenzhen, Zhuhai and Shantou in Guangdong Province and Xiamen in Fujian Province.  The average size of these SEZs is predictably bigger than that in India. 

One other factor that I noticed was trade sites promoting Chinese manufactures.  There are simple too many websites. Alibaba.com, chinab2bsource.com, etc. provide great information about any manufacturing item under the sun.  I’m yet to see online promotions of Indian manufacturers on such a large scale. 

The Chinese success in manufacturing sector is not a stroke of luck.  It is a well planned and well executed story that is well replicated by Thailand and Korea. India is nowhere near.

My report on the assignment is almost over, left with the executive summary.  Don't think m gonna do that while i'm in ahmedabad.  Would be landing in Delhi on 22nd… the report will get justice then…